The initiative for the ‘Nets’ project arose out of a group meditation on the ambiguous nature of ocean nets, which have been appropriated to become the benign backdrop for a magical marine world of mermaids, starfish and sunken galleons – a fish and chip shop cliché – despite the fact that, with their increasingly destructive impact on the natural world, they are truly sinister. This ambiguity of nets suggested their potential as a metaphor for other ‘nets’ in the world, similarly operating to capture, to control, exclude. Now there is a group of artists (including those from 3 diverse university departments, in 3 diverse countries) viewing their own subjects of interest within such a ‘nets’ framework .
We are working up to exhibitions of ‘Nets’ artworks – maybe paintings, sculpture, architecture, design, performance art, as well as digital and virtual works. They will be representative of an artist’s personal and cultural reflections, as well as the opportunity for symbolic interpretations and postmodern reinterpretations. They may allude to socio-political aspects such as class, power, ideologies, etc; experiences of the world, personal to the artist or experienced by a social group.
By setting a broad scope for the ‘Nets’ project, we can adopt an inclusive definition of ‘art’. George Dickie is a Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at University of Illinois at Chicago and one of the most influential philosophers of art working in the analytical tradition. His ‘Institutional’ theory about the nature of art has both inspired supporters, who produced variations on the theory, as well as being criticized by detractors for being over-inclusive. For him a work of art is an artefact, some aspect of which has had the status of ‘candidate for appreciation’ conferred upon it by anyone who believes themselves to be part of the art world (importantly, craft is not art, though, of course, craft techniques and skills may well be employed in the making of artworks).
‘Nets’ naturally leans towards ‘conceptual art’, which can be said to be any art that is predominantly idea-based – rather than created mainly for aesthetic appreciation. In a broader sense, perhaps almost all art has some conceptual element (religious art, impressionism, cubism); but only where this dominates do we usually speak of a work as conceptual.
On the eve of another ‘Nets’ project workshop, to see ‘where we are going’, it may be worth reading over these notes from the first workshop – back in June. Other strands to the ‘nets’ thread might have been teased out since then, but these responses show that we considered the basic nature of the devices we were looking at to be – in the words of one participant – ‘all about control’.
What are ‘nets’ used for?
- filtering, catching, hunting, hiding, separating , collecting, controlling, excluding, provoking, intriguing, alluding
What do they make you think of (associations)?
- camouflaging/ obscuring/ hiding, display/ façade,
- fire-walls/ filtering/ censoring/ entrapment,
- slipping through safety nets (homelessness),
- by-catch/ collateral damage,
- keepers/ cocooning (cultural readings),
- insecurities/ inhibitions,
- religious divisions/ ambiguity (hiding and attracting the gaze)